Liberalism, and a crossing of the Rubicon.
What does Liberalism mean anymore? Many appear to claim the mantle of Liberalism without apparently understanding the formulation of the concept. Once Liberalism encapsulated the idea that humanity should move away from the rule of elites and toward the vox populi, vox deus – The voice of the People is the voice of God. Or, to adopt an overused slogan, power to the people. However, somewhere, somehow, this became lost by later day adherents of Liberalism who identify themselves as ‘Progressive’.
Recent events are casting a new light or who or what Liberalism may be. There are those figures who are openly calling for an end of stability, and end of the status quo, for change. And then there are those who are appealing to their ‘friends’ to help maintain stability. Individuals like Bashir Assad. What is stunning to me is that in spite of everything, despite being damned behind the ‘Stability’ of the Cold War, Liberalism is still alive and well in the world:
Walid Jumblatt:
"It's strange for me to say it, but this process of change has started because of the American invasion of Iraq," explains Jumblatt. "I was cynical about Iraq. But when I saw the Iraqi people voting three weeks ago, 8 million of them, it was the start of a new Arab world." Jumblatt says this spark of democratic revolt is spreading. "The Syrian people, the Egyptian people, all say that something is changing. The Berlin Wall has fallen. We can see it."
Even better is we all ready have a ‘proof of concept’ that Liberalism can win over tyrrany.
Claus Christian Malzahn of der Spiegel:Yet three years later, East Germany had disappeared from the map. Gorbachev had a lot to do with it, but it was the East Germans who played the larger role. When analysts are confronted by real people, amazing things can happen. And maybe history can repeat itself. Maybe the people of Syria, Iran or Jordan will get the idea in their heads to free themselves from their oppressive regimes just as the East Germans did. When the voter turnout in Iraq recently exceeded that of many Western nations, the chorus of critique from Iraq alarmists was, at least for a couple of days, quieted. Just as quiet as the chorus of Germany experts on the night of Nov. 9, 1989 when the Wall fell.
So what exactly is the stated principle of 21st century Liberalism? To state it simply, by the person you’d probably expect to be the last proponent of Liberalism;
GW Bush: "the false stability of dictatorship and stagnation can only lead to deeper resentment," and that "lasting successful reform in a broader Middle East will not be imposed from the outside. It must be chosen from within."
In other words, the best way to save ourselves and the Arab world from the cul-de-sac that have placed themselves in is through the rigorous application of Liberalism.
One thing that we can’t argue is that during the Cold War we became a Conservative power, pursuing the status quo, propping up odious but ‘friendly’ regimes in the name of containment. But after events that have unfolded since that September, it became hard to ignore a recurring theme: the Rose revolution in Georgia. The Orange Revolution in Ukraine. Iraqi’s voting by the millions. The people of Lebanon demanding that the Syrians stop oppressing them. Demonstrations against Mubarak in Egypt and his stunning response.
Can all of these things be a coincidence? I find that unlikely. Perhaps, a better explanation is that the fist nation born of the Humanist Enlightenment has returned to its roots and is demanding the world change, instead of it changing for the word. That vox populi, vox deus matters. And the people of the world are listening.
Update: The Governmet of Lebanon has quit because of mass protest
Update 2: And what is this? Discontent in Syria?
Update 3: Azerbaijan!?!? With more from the BBC.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home